Monday, April 4, 2011


A Tea Party Star Stirs Iowans, and She Isn’t Palin

Matt York/Associated Press
Michele Bachmann is weighing a run for president in 2012.
WEST DES MOINES, Iowa — Sarah Palin, the reigning heroine of many social conservatives, has given few signals that she will make a presidential bid. Mike Huckabee, who won the Iowa caucuses in 2008 on the strength of his appeal to evangelicals and other constituencies, has mostly offered reasons for not joining the race.
Multimedia

Blogs

The Caucus

The latest on President Obama, the new Congress and other news from Washington and around the nation. Join the discussion.
Steve Hebert for The New York Times
Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota speaking at a conservative conference last month in Iowa, where her recent visits have drawn an enthusiastic response.

Readers' Comments

So into that space has come Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota.
Best known as a fiery presence on cable television and the founder of the House Tea Party caucus, she is now exploring whether to seek the Republican presidential nomination. And early reaction to her in Iowa, where she was born and raised, suggests not only that she might do it, but also that she could have a substantial impact on the race.
On a break between meeting voters and conducting radio and television interviews — a staple of nearly every day — Ms. Bachmann took a seat in the bar of a hotel here and left no doubt that she was serious about running.
“It isn’t that I was born thinking I had to be president,” she said, leaning in and talking softer than she does on television or at Tea Party rallies. “I’m getting a lot of encouragement to run from people across the country. I don’t believe this is a rash decision.”
There is a pecking order in Congress, and Ms. Bachmann’s televised Tea Party response to the president’s State of the Union address irritated House Republican leaders, who had already rebuffed her when she sought a leadership position this year. But there are no rules of seniority in presidential politics, where exploring a candidacy takes little more than an airplane ticket to an early-voting state and a roster of curious party activists.
After a four-day visit to Iowa late last month in which Ms. Bachmann declared “I’m in!” at several stops, it became clear that Republicans were taking notice. At a minimum, the clamor among some social conservatives for Ms. Palin to run has quieted as the attention surrounding Ms. Bachmann has grown.
“If Congresswoman Bachmann gets in, she has the potential to appeal to a lot of people who might have gone for Governor Palin,” Gov. Terry E. Branstad of Iowa said in an interview. “Imagine if they both got in. That could make it really interesting.”
Ms. Bachmann would have substantial obstacles to overcome. She has already made some high-profile gaffes — including declaring late last month that the opening shots of the Revolutionary War took place in New Hampshire, not Massachusetts — that raise questions about her preparation for the scrutiny of a national campaign.
Her Congressional office has experienced considerable turnover, including five chiefs of staff in the last four years. A former chairman of the Minnesota Republican PartyRon Carey, resigned after five months in the post. He told reporters in Minneapolis that he would not support her presidential bid, saying, “She’s not going to be an electable candidate for us.”
Still, Ms. Bachmann, who turns 55 this week, demonstrated her national fund-raising ability by raising a record-setting $13 million last year in her House race.
While voters at this stage may be more inclined to listen than to sign on the dotted line, the energy she creates among leading conservative groups is unmatched by anyone but Ms. Palin.
“If Sarah doesn’t do something, she may find that the field has been pre-empted,” said Danny Carroll, a former state representative and a leading conservative activist. He said he did not know any Republicans who had recently heard from Ms. Palin.
Kent Sorensen, a Republican who was elected last fall to the Iowa Senate and has become a leader in the Tea Party movement, has signed up to work for Ms. Bachmann if she proceeds with a campaign.
“I don’t want to bash Sarah Palin, but she lacks substance,” Mr. Sorensen said. “I believe Michele Bachmann has more substance. I think she’d mop the floor with her, if you want me to be frank.”
Here in Iowa, where the caucuses are expected to open the party’s nominating fight, Ms. Bachmann has at least one other selling point she repeats to every audience.
“I come here as one of you — an Iowan!” Ms. Bachmann said on the steps of the Capitol, her voice amplified so much it could be heard a few blocks away.
Ms. Bachmann, who moved to Minnesota as a teenager, eagerly recounted how her Norwegian ancestors settled near Waterloo, Iowa. And she confides that she was raised a Democrat — she and her husband, Marcus, worked for Jimmy Carter’s 1976 campaign — but she had an awakening reading a Gore Vidal book that she found to be “mocking our founding fathers.”
There is no other potential Republican candidate who delivers more crowd-pleasing one-liners — usually at President Obama’s expense. They come in a rapid-fire staccato with barely enough time for the applause to fade between punch lines.

“What we need is a change of address form for the person living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,” she said over loud laughter. As she talked about what she contended was government expansion under the new health care law, she declared, “I want a waiver from the last two years of President Obama!”
Multimedia

Blogs

The Caucus

The latest on President Obama, the new Congress and other news from Washington and around the nation. Join the discussion.

Readers' Comments

Beyond her effect on any potential Palin candidacy, Ms. Bachmann’s entry into the race could have implications for other candidates seeking to appeal to the same slices of the electorate.
Tim Pawlenty, a former governor of Minnesota, is from the same state and is trying to appeal to the Tea Party movement. Former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania might lose whatever advantage he has among voters whose leading concern is opposing abortion rights. Mitt Romney is already struggling to explain the health care law he signed as governor of Massachusetts, and no candidate criticizes the health care plan pushed through Congress by Mr. Obama louder than Ms. Bachmann.
Ms. Bachmann said that if she joined the race, she intended to do so by early summer, leaving plenty of time to organize for the Iowa Straw Poll in August, which would be the first test of her influence on the field.
At the hotel here, Ms. Bachmann sounded less sure of herself when answering spontaneous questions than when delivering speeches at large rallies. She served six years in the Minnesota Senate and is in her fifth year in Congress. Asked if she thought she would face questions about her experience, she paused for the first time in the interview.
“I think that’s a good question, because people need to know the background of the person they will entrust with this greatest nation on earth,” she said. “I come from a modest background. I put myself through college and law school and a postdoctorate program in tax law.”
She also raised 5 children and 23 foster children, making her especially popular among conservative families. Ms. Bachmann appeared at a gathering of parents who home-school their children, where several voters, in interviews, mentioned Ms. Palin. The most obvious traits Ms. Bachmann shares with Ms. Palin may be their brown hair and their sex — people do not often approach Newt Gingrich and say he reminds them of Haley Barbour — but she said she was not bothered by being asked about parallels.
“I personally like Sarah Palin; she’s a lovely person,” Ms. Bachmann said. “I’ve had the privilege of meeting her and being with her on three different occasions.”
Ms. Bachmann said that all potential candidates needed to make their own decisions about entering the presidential race and that hers would not be influenced by anyone else’s candidacy.
“We need a strong, bold constitutional conservative who won’t back down and who will fight for the values we believe in,” she said. “That’s what we need for our nominee, whether it is me or whether it is someone else.”


April 3, 2011

The Truth, Still Inconvenient


So the joke begins like this: An economist, a lawyer and a professor of marketing walk into a room. What’s the punch line? They were three of the five “expert witnesses” Republicans called for last week’s Congressional hearing on climate science.
But the joke actually ended up being on the Republicans, when one of the two actual scientists they invited to testify went off script.
Prof. Richard Muller of Berkeley, a physicist who has gotten into the climate skeptic game, has been leading the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project, an effort partially financed by none other than the Koch foundation. And climate deniers — who claim that researchers at NASA and other groups analyzing climate trends have massaged and distorted the data — had been hoping that the Berkeley project would conclude that global warming is a myth.
Instead, however, Professor Muller reported that his group’s preliminary results find a global warming trend “very similar to that reported by the prior groups.”
The deniers’ response was both predictable and revealing; more on that shortly. But first, let’s talk a bit more about that list of witnesses, which raised the same question I and others have had about a number of committee hearings held since the G.O.P. retook control of the House — namely, where do they find these people?
My favorite, still, was Ron Paul’s first hearing on monetary policy, in which the lead witness was someone best known for writing a book denouncing Abraham Lincoln as a “horrific tyrant” — and for advocating a new secessionist movement as the appropriate response to the “new American fascialistic state.”
The ringers (i.e., nonscientists) at last week’s hearing weren’t of quite the same caliber, but their prepared testimony still had some memorable moments. One was the lawyer’s declaration that the E.P.A. can’t declare that greenhouse gas emissions are a health threat, because these emissions have been rising for a century, but public health has improved over the same period. I am not making this up.
Oh, and the marketing professor, in providing a list of past cases of “analogies to the alarm over dangerous manmade global warming” — presumably intended to show why we should ignore the worriers — included problems such as acid rain and the ozone hole that have been contained precisely thanks to environmental regulation.
But back to Professor Muller. His climate-skeptic credentials are pretty strong: he has denounced both Al Gore and my colleague Tom Friedman as “exaggerators,” and he has participated in a number of attacks on climate research, including the witch hunt over innocuous e-mails from British climate researchers. Not surprisingly, then, climate deniers had high hopes that his new project would support their case.
You can guess what happened when those hopes were dashed.
Just a few weeks ago Anthony Watts, who runs a prominent climate denialist Web site, praised the Berkeley project and piously declared himself “prepared to accept whatever result they produce, even if it proves my premise wrong.” But never mind: once he knew that Professor Muller was going to present those preliminary results, Mr. Watts dismissed the hearing as “post normal science political theater.” And one of the regular contributors on his site dismissed Professor Muller as “a man driven by a very serious agenda.”
Of course, it’s actually the climate deniers who have the agenda, and nobody who’s been following this discussion believed for a moment that they would accept a result confirming global warming. But it’s worth stepping back for a moment and thinking not just about the science here, but about the morality.
For years now, large numbers of prominent scientists have been warning, with increasing urgency, that if we continue with business as usual, the results will be very bad, perhaps catastrophic. They could be wrong. But if you’re going to assert that they are in fact wrong, you have a moral responsibility to approach the topic with high seriousness and an open mind. After all, if the scientists are right, you’ll be doing a great deal of damage.
But what we had, instead of high seriousness, was a farce: a supposedly crucial hearing stacked with people who had no business being there and instant ostracism for a climate skeptic who was actually willing to change his mind in the face of evidence. As I said, no surprise: as Upton Sinclair pointed out long ago, it’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.
But it’s terrifying to realize that this kind of cynical careerism — for that’s what it is — has probably ensured that we won’t do anything about climate change until catastrophe is already upon us.
So on second thought, I was wrong when I said that the joke was on the G.O.P.; actually, the joke is on the human race. 

Sunday, April 3, 2011


Victory!

Mar 14, 2011
In late 2010, a tiny group of lesbian activists based out of a safehouse in the townships of Cape Town started an international fight against 'corrective rape', whereby men rape lesbian women to 'turn' them straight. In less than a month, their call for South Africa's justice minister to take action on 'corrective rape' became the most popular Change.org petition of all time, taking 'corrective rape' from an unspoken epidemic to a national discussion and attracting what amounted to more than 170,000 supporters in 163 countries.
Earlier today, those same township activists walked into the halls of South Africa's Parliament and convinced some of the most powerful officials in the country to agree to the long term, sustained engagement of various government arms and civil society groups to research, develop and implement a national action plan to tackle 'corrective rape' and the intersecting issues of gender-based violence, anti-LGBTI violence and hate crimes.
In short: we demanded that the South African government take 'corrective rape' seriously, and they have agreed to do so... and then some! Click here to read how it all went down.

PETITIONING

  • Head of Communications, Ministry of Justice(Collen Msibi)
  • Deputy Minister of Justice Andries Carl Nel
  • Chief of Staff, Ministry of Justice(Tlali Tlali)
  • Private Secretary, Ministry of Justice(Phillip Musekwa)
  • Minister of Justice Jeffrey Thamsanqa Radebe
  • Parliamentary Liaison Officer, Ministry of Justice(Thando Ntlemeza)
  • Head of Deputy Minister's Office(Blendynn Williams)

SIGNATURES

171,755

PETITIONING

Head of Communications, Ministry of Justice
+ 6 others

STARTED BY

OVERVIEW

"Corrective Rape" is a term used to describe when a man rapes a lesbian with the aim of 'turning' her heterosexual!

This heinous crime is prolific in South Africa, especially in the ‘townships.’

Most of the victims are tortured, grievously assaulted and sometimes murdered! They are also prone to getting HIV/AIDS from the assault, and many of them commit suicide as a result of the ‘corrective rape’!

The South African government and justice system are failing the victims of Corrective Rape by letting the perpetrators out on ridiculously low bail, and taking literally years to bring the court-cases to a conclusion. In the meantime the victims have to live with seeing and being harassed and threatened by their rapists every day, as do those who help the victims!

Get very occasional campaign updates on Facebook - just click like at the top of the page.

In the last 10 years:
*31 lesbian women have been murdered because of their sexuality
*More than 10 lesbians a week are raped or gang raped in Cape Town alone
*150 women are raped every day in South Africa
*For every 25 men accused of rape in South Africa, 24 walk free

Despite all this, hate crimes on the basis of sexual orientation are not recognised by South African law!

We call on the South African government to declare "Corrective Rape" a Hate-Crime that is punishable by the harshest sentences! 

Winning this campaign depends on our ability to call on thousands of supporters like you. After signing this petition, please follow us on Facebook - just click 'Like' at the top of the page. 

PETITION LETTER

140,000 and Counting Call on Minister Radebe to Declare "Corrective Rape" a Hate Crime
Dear Minister Radebe,
I am deeply concerned by your refusal to respond to the cries of more than 140,000 people from 163 countries calling on you to address “corrective rape”, the increasingly common hate crime in which men rape lesbian women to 'turn' them straight or 'cure' them of their sexual orientation.

South Africa was the first nation on earth to outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation in the constitution, the first African country to legalize same-sex marriage and the world's first republic to guarantee LGBT citizens equal rights in all realms of life (including adoption and military service).


But the South African government and justice system is failing the victims of corrective rape, by letting the perpetrators out on ridiculously low bail and taking literally years to bring the court-cases to a conclusion. Victims and those who help them see these rapists every day, and are regularly taunted and threatened by them.


Activists from Luleki Sizwe in the Cape Town township of Gugulethu have tried to bring the issue to your attention on numerous occasions, asking you to declare 'corrective rape' a hate crime and work with them to find solutions.


But when they did not receive a reply from you or anyone in your office, they launched an international petition. It has since become the most popular petition of all time on Change.org, the fastest growing social action platform on earth.


Mr Minister, some 140,000 people from 163 countries have called on you to do something about corrective rape. Since Luleki Sizwe called on the international community for support, you have received an average 3,000 letters a day!


In the media the campaign calling has been covered by the BBC, Voice of America, SABC, the Sowetan, the Cape Argus, KAYA FM and many others.


But to date, the only response received has been from Tlali Tlali, your Chief of Staff, complaining about the volume of emails on his iPad.


Is this the kind of impression that the South African Ministry of Justice wants to give some 125,000 people from all over the world? Would it not be much easier to just pick up the phone, call the activists, and try to work WITH them in good faith to actually address the problem?


Luleki Sizwe is a small Cape Town charity that works to rescue, support, feed and nurse to health survivors of 'corrective rape'. It is led by community activist Ndumie Funda, who founded the group in 2007 after both her best friend and fiancée were the victims of 'corrective rape'.


One recent case, about which Luleki Sizwe supporters have already sent you tens of thousands of letters, is that of Millicent Gaika, who was strangled with a wire, beaten and raped for five hours by Andile Ngoza in order to "turn her straight".


Since that time the court-case has been postponed numerous times, and Andile is out on bail, roaming the same streets where Millie lives. This has forced her to go into hiding as the courtcase has again been postponed to February 2011.


Andile is forbidden from entering Gugulethu as part of his bail conditions, but he has constantly broken those conditions and threatened Ndumie a number of times. One time Ndumie called the police and Andile was arrested, but he was back on the streets within a day or two - on R60 bail! He and his friends then started pursuing Ndumie, forcing her into hiding.


I ask that you investigate the government’s handling of this case.


I also ask that you work WITH Ndumie and the volunteers at Luleki Sizwe to achieve the following goals:


1. Acknowledgement: A statement by the minister decrying corrective rape and with a public commitment to lobby to have it classified as a hate crime with a minimum 25 year sentence.


2. Prevention: Showing leadership in developing resources for LGBT awareness and public education against sexual violence. The introduction into the school-syllabus of anti-homophobic instruction and information, for the educators and the pupils, as a lot of the rapes and homophobic bullying occurs in schools, by pupils and educators.


3. Enforcement: Resources for better policing and enforcement of existing law, and development of tougher laws to combat corrective rape. Specifically:

*The establishment of a national task force to combat LGBTI crimes, including corrective rape.
*A FEMALE officer who is trained to handle all aspects of rape on duty at ALL police stations 24/7 , or a social worker trained in the same at ALL police stations.
*Anti-homophobic training for ALL South African Police Members! (The detective who took Millie's first statement was a drunk, homophobic male!)
*A minimum bail amount for LGBTI violent crimes, and no chance of getting out on bail again if they break bail conditions (Andile R60)
*A Minimum sentence of 25-life for corrective rape!
*The right to a speedy trial - currently the court-cases are taking years!
*At least 1 detective @ each Police Station (especially in the townships) that handles all the LGBTI cases, so that they know what they are dealing with and how to handle the cases, as each time it is a different detective and there is no continuity.
*A clampdown on the bribery and corruption at Police Stations and Courts, where the dockets are often "lost"

4: Recovery: A commitment to build safe-houses and found recovery programs for the survivors of corrective rape. Survivors of corrective rape should not have to go to the same school or live in the same area as the perpetrator.


I call on you to actively take up the cause of corrective rape, to immediately make contact with the activists of Luleki Sizwe and to make a good faith effort to work with them to reach the urgent goals above.


We look forward to your response.
[Your name]

Victory!

Mar 29, 2011
Texas received so much trafficking-related attention during the Super Bowl; it was easy to forget that SB 98 was quietly making its way through the state’s legislative process. But four months and 370 Change.org supporters later, the anti-trafficking bill passed without a hitch.
What does this mean for the Lone Star State? Tougher laws on sex and labor trafficking and harsher penalties for child trafficking.

SIGNATURES

370

PETITIONING

Sen. Leticia Van de Putte (D-San Antonio)

STARTED BY

Dana Liebelson
Washington, DC

OVERVIEW

Each year, about 10,000 people are trafficked through Texas for the purpose of prostitution. For every three calls made to the National Human Trafficking Resource Center hotline, one will be from the Lone Star state. And to make matters worse, the Super Bowl, a massive attraction for prostitution, will be held next February in Dallas. Although Texas has done a terrific job of taking preemptive measures to crack down on pimps and sex traffickers—including proposing a new trafficking law—it is still neglecting victims. Urge Texan lawmakers to allot funds for trafficking shelters as part of SB 98. 
A common theme among victims is that they simply have no place to go. When one victim, a Thai woman named Kiki, managed to pay off her “debt” to her pimp (earning him over US$200,000)—she was locked out of her massage parlor in the middle of the night. With no alternative shelter, she asked to be let back in. Later, when she was brutally raped by knifepoint, she called the only phone number she knew—her pimp’s. Trafficking victims need shelters that provide care and security tailored to their predicament, and they need to know about them (one good example of this is the recent poster campaign in Washington). 
A legislative assistant for Sen. Van de Putte recently told The Texas Tribune that SB 98 is a “shell bill,” and will include the parts that people agree on. Let’s agree that shelters for victims of sex trafficking are just as important as law enforcement when it comes to combating this national problem.