If I recall correctly, when France gave up Indochina as a colony, the leading nations of the world met in Geneva with regard to helping those colonies become independent nations. And since North and South Vietnam had been, previous to colonization, two separate countries, provisions were made that these two countries could by a vote of all their people together, decide whether they wanted to be one country or not.
And there wasn't anything surreptitious about it, that when Ho Chi Minh refused to participate in such an election -- and there was provision that people of both countries could cross the border and live in the other country if they wanted to. And when they began leaving by the thousands and thousands from North Vietnam to live in South Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh closed the border and again violated that part of the agreement.
And openly, our country sent military advisers there to help a country which had been a colony have such things as a national security force, an army, you might say, or a military to defend itself. And they were doing this, if I recall correctly, also in civilian clothes, no weapons, until they began being blown up where they lived and walking down the street by people riding by on bicycles and throwing pipe bombs at them. And then they were permitted to carry sidearms or wear uniforms. But it was totally a program until John F. Kennedy--when these attacks and forays became so great that John F. Kennedy authorized the sending in of a division of Marines. And that was the first move toward combat troops in Vietnam.
Franklin then notes that:
This rewriting of history was fundamental to Reagan's definition of the war as "a noble cause," a phrase he first presented along with another new term -- the "Vietnamese syndrome" -- in a 1980 campaign speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars.
Astonishingly, not a single sentence in Reagan's pseudohistory is accurate or truthful...
This ought to teach us to be VERY leery of that which the political and media elites pitch our way. They always have an agenda. And their priorties will never be the priorities of the every day working person, the chronically unemployed / underemployed people, the marginalized, the aged, the infirm, the widow, nor the orphan
