Friday, December 3, 2010

Here is a revealing headline: The noose tightens around WikiLeaks' Assange

And it reveals a "truth"; that various vigilante groups seek to put a rope around the neck of Julian Assasnge and strangle that poor motherf#cker so that he can't be heard from again; so that the embarrassment he has caused to so many American politicians will just go away.

The noose tightens around WikiLeaks' Assange


LONDON – The law is closing in on Julian Assange. Swedish authorities won a court ruling Thursday in their bid to arrest the WikiLeaks founder for questioning in a rape case, British intelligence is said to know where in England he's hiding, and U.S. pundits and politicians are demanding he be hunted down or worse.
Hunted down OR WORSE of course, they are advocating his murder - and with no trial - and for what crimes?
The former computer hacker who has embarrassed the U.S. government and foreign leaders with his online release of a huge trove of secret American diplomatic cables
 Those are his crimes; in a nutshell. That he did
(1) Embarrass the U.S. government and
(2) Embarrass foreign leaders with his online release of a huge trove of secret American diplomatic cables (which ain't exactly so secret now!)
suffered a legal setback when Sweden's Supreme Court upheld an order to detain him — a move that could lead to his extradition.
So, he would have rather not been detained - in order that he might avoid extradition.
Meanwhile, Assange continues to leak sensitive documents. Newly posted cables on WikiLeaks' website detailed a host of embarrassing disclosures, including allegations that Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi accepted kickbacks and a deeply unflattering assessment of Turkmenistan's president.
Berlusconi - accepting bribes?  The wealthiest newspaper mogul in the world who also (coincidentally) happens to be Prime Minister?  In order to avoid facing criminal charges? ... And worse still - Berlusconin uttered deeply unflattering assessment of Turkmenistan's presidnet.!  SO

TAKE THAT Julian Assange! Your ass is gonna be got!
Assange is accused in Sweden of rape, sexual molestation and coercion in a case from August, and Swedish officials have alerted Interpol and issued a European arrest warrant to bring him in for questioning.
In America, we send men who own and fight dogs to jail, curtailing their professional sports careers at their heights; serial rapist, sexual molesters, and sexual coercionists, we ban them from their first four football games of the season. Which is worse? I ask you.
The 39-year-old Australian denies the charges, which his lawyer, Mark Stephens, said apparently stemmed from a "dispute over consensual but unprotected sex." Stephens said the case is turning into an exercise in persecution.
I'd LOVE to hear the courtroom exchange in re: the "dispute over consensual but unprotected sex."
While Assange has not made a public appearance for nearly a month, his lawyer insisted authorities know where to find him.
As in, he's not playing hide 'n seek?
"Both the British and the Swedish authorities know how to contact him, and the security services know exactly where he is," Stephens told The Associated Press.
It was unclear if or when police would act on Sweden's demands. Police there acknowledged Thursday they would have to refile their European arrest warrant after British authorities asked for more details on the maximum penalties for the three crimes.
They want the MAX?  Because ... he's a frigging example.
Scotland Yard declined comment, as did the Serious and Organized Crime Agency, responsible for processing European arrest warrants for suspects in England — where The Guardian claims Assange is hiding out.

In a statement, Assange's lawyer in Sweden, Bjorn Hurtig, suggested that Assange is being retaliated against for the leaks.

"I do find it somewhat strange and to say the least `coincidental' that Interpol has made the arrest warrant public simultaneous to Wikileaks releasing its latest revelations," Hurtig said. "My mind remains open as to whether the prosecutor has been influenced by any third-party considerations."
 Just saying, ya' know?
Stephens — who also represents the AP on media-related matters — said that if Assange is ever served with a warrant, he will fight it in British court. "The process in this case has been so utterly irregular that the chances of a valid arrest warrant being submitted to me are very small," he said.

The Swedish case has been subject to a great deal of back and forth, with Swedish prosecutors repeatedly overruling each other and disagreeing over whether to classify the most serious accusation as rape.

WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson said late Wednesday that the organization is trying to keep Assange's location a secret for security reasons. He noted that commentators in the United States and Canada have called for Assange to be hunted down or killed.

Sarah Palin, the former Republican vice presidential candidate, likened Assange to an al-Qaida propagandist and accused him, without offering any proof, of having "blood on his hands."

"Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al-Qaida and Taliban leaders?"
Easy.  Because they are not the threat to the U.S. government that Julian Assange is!
she asked in a message posted on her Facebook page.

"I think Assange should be assassinated, actually," Tom Flanagan, a former adviser to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, told the CBC. "I think Obama should put out a contract or maybe use a drone or something." Flanagan, a U.S.-born professor of political science at the University of Calgary, later apologized.
Flannagan - UNFUCK you. Stop breeding. Asshole.
In Washington, the top Democrat and Republican at the Senate Intelligence Committee called on Attorney General Eric Holder to prosecute Assange for espionage. Committee chairwoman Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and vice chairman Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., said in a letter Thursday that they believe Assange's behavior falls under the Espionage Act, which makes it a crime to willfully pass on defense information that could hurt the U.S.

U.S. government lawyers are investigating whether Assange can be prosecuted for spying, a senior American defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said earlier this week. WikiLeaks has not said how it obtained the documents, but the government's prime suspect is an Army private, Bradley Manning, who is in the brig on charges of leaking other classified documents to WikiLeaks.
State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said WikiLeaks is not a news organization and Assange is neither a journalist nor a whistle-blower, but someone with a political agenda.

"I think he's an anarchist," Crowley said. He said Assange is
Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society, or anarchy.[1][2] It seeks to diminish or even abolish authority in the conduct of human relations.[3] Anarchists may widely disagree on what additional criteria are required in anarchism. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy says, "there is no single defining position that all anarchists hold, and those considered anarchists at best share a certain family resemblance."[4]
There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[5] Strains of anarchism have been divided into the categories of social and individualist anarchism or similar dual classifications.[6][7] Anarchism is often considered to be a radical left-wing ideology,[8][9] and much of anarchist economics and anarchist legal philosophy reflect anti-statist interpretations of communism, collectivism, syndicalism or participatory economics. However, anarchism has always included an individualist strain [10] supporting a market economy and private property, or morally unrestrained egoism.[11][12] Some individualist anarchists are also socialists.[13][14]
Differing fundamentally, some anarchist schools of thought support anything from extreme individualismcollectivism.[2] In the end, for anarchist historian Daniel Guerin "Some anarchists are more individualistic than social, some more social than individualistic. However, one cannot conceive of a libertarian who is not an individualist."[15] The position known as anarchism without adjectives consists on "recognising the right of other tendencies to the name "anarchist" while, obviously, having their own preferences for specific types of anarchist theory and their own arguments why other types are flawed."[16
"trying to undermine the international system that enables us to cooperate and collaborate with other governments."
 Just what the f#ck international system is that? Did WE THE PEOPLE get a chance to vote for it? Is it democratic?  Is it the same system that enabled us to cooperate and collaborate with the sovereign Iraqi government under it's democratically elected lead Saddam Hussein?  If so, I want out, and anybody that can do anything to tear down such a flawed stucture ought to be nominated for sainthood.

"What he's doing is damaging to our efforts and the efforts of other governments," the spokesman said.
 Damaging to your efforts to do just the f#cking hell WHAT?  Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran?
One batch of the latest leaked dispatches — these from the U.S. Embassy staff in Turkmenistan — portrays the president of the former Soviet state in Central Asia, Gurbanguli Berdymukhamedov, as "vain, suspicious, guarded, strict, very conservative, a practiced liar," and "not a very bright guy."
Sounds an AWFUL lot like George W. Bush, but, I'm just saying.  Oh, and BTW - this sounds like about what we'd expect from a high school government where the KEWL KIDZ win all the elections and make all the rules (win all the erections and make themselves fools; yes, that too.)
According to another one of the cables, Georgia's ambassador in Rome claimed that Berlusconi was promised a cut of the profits in energy deals with Russia. Berlusconi denied the allegation.
OF F#CKING COURSE - he was promised a cut of the profits, and he would deny the allegation.
The documents also included a frank assessment from the American envoy to Stockholm about Sweden's historic policy of nonalignment — a policy that the U.S. ambassador, Michael Woods, seemed to suggest was for public consumption only.
Sweden's military and intelligence cooperation with the U.S. "give the lie to the official policy" of non-participation in military alliances, Woods said. He added in a separate cable that Sweden's defense minister fondly remembers his time as a high school student in America and "loves the U.S."
We are all Americans now!  Have the Swedes had a chance to weigh in on this?
Woods cautioned American officials not to trumpet Sweden-U.S. cooperation in the fight against terrorism too openly, because that would open up the Swedish government to domestic criticism.
OMG!  Please Brer Fox - don't open up me government to domestic criticism. ANYTHING but that!

In England, meanwhile, a front-page story in The Guardian alleged that one of the leaked cables showed British politicians trying to keep Parliament in the dark over the storage of American cluster bombs on British territory — despite an international ban on the weapons. Britain's Foreign Office denied the charge.
WELL ,... looks like time to go to the Guardian!
___
Rising and Louise Nordstrom reported from Stockholm. Gillian Smith in London contributed to this report.